El parlamento canadiense rechazó condenar el aborto selectivo por sexo
- Michael Cook
- 5 / 06 / 2021
La India no ha logrado revertir su desigual proporción de varones y mujeres: millones de niñas están siendo abortadas anualmente. Y ello no es por falta de mensajes sociales progresistas o por ausencia de retórica feminista. Políticos, activistas, educadores suman sus voces en un clamor compartido: no aborten a las niñas. Pero la prédica no ha funcionado.
La mayoría de los lectores de BioEdge e IBIS News no viven en India y no están sujetos a las presiones de esa sociedad. En países como Estados Unidos, el Reino Unido o Australia, podríamos incluso presumir que nunca apoyaríamos el aborto selectivo por sexo, ¿verdad?
No estemos tan seguros. La socialmente ultra-progresista Canadá acaba de tener la oportunidad de rechazar la selección de sexo y la desperdició. Su parlamento votó abrumadoramente en contra de un proyecto de ley que condena la selección de sexo. Esta es la noticia:
Según las Naciones Unidas, "se cree que alrededor de 140 millones de mujeres están siendo ’desaparecidas’ en todo el mundo, como resultado de la preferencia por el hijo varón, lo cual hace de la selección de sexo con prejuicios de género, una forma brutal de discriminación". Hace diez años, las agencias de la ONU, incluyendo el ACNUDH, UNFPA, UNICEF, ONU. Mujeres y la OMS publicaron un documento de posición condenando esta creciente eliminación de las niñas.
El Fondo de Población de la ONU declaró el año pasado que la selección del sexo tenía graves consecuencias para las sociedades. “El aumento en la selección del sexo es alarmante, ya que refleja el lugar degradado en que se ubica a mujeres y niñas. El desequilibrio de género resultante también tiene un efecto perjudicial en otros ámbitos sociales. Ya hay estudios que lo vinculan con el incremento de casos de trata y violencia sexual".
No obstante, en una de las mayores incongruencias de la política moderna, esta semana el parlamento canadiense votó abrumadoramente en contra de un proyecto de ley que prohíbe los abortos selectivos por sexo.
Efectivamente, el proyecto de ley C-233, presentado por la diputada de Saskatchewan, Cathay Wagantall, tipificaba como delito "que un médico practique un aborto sabiendo que está fundado exclusivamente en el sexo genético".
Perdió por un margen de 248 a 82, con los liberales, Bloc Quebecois, NDP y Green Party, todos votando en contra. Los miembros del Partido Conservador tenían libertad de voto por parte de sus dirigentes, y la mayoría se opuso, pero no su líder, Erin O’Toole. La ministra sobre asuntos de la mujer, Maryam Monsef, calificó el proyecto de ley de “peligroso”.
El problema de fondo, por supuesto, es el aborto. Independientemente de las opiniones de los parlamentarios sobre el "génerocidio", creen que un voto en contra del aborto selectivo por sexo conlleva un voto en contra del aborto. Y eso es impensable. "El debate ha terminado", declaró la Sra. Monsef: “Las mujeres son las únicas que controlan sus cuerpos y sus opciones de atención médica. No es este un lugar para que los políticos intervengan".
COMENTARIOS
Mensaje de Vincentliatt » 29 de diciembre de 2025 » joshuacearley1923@roentgenotmyu.ru
CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss decided to shelve a planned “60 Minutes” story titled “Inside CECOT,” creating an uproar inside CBS, but the report has reached a worldwide audience anyway.
mine exchange
On Monday, some Canadian viewers noticed that the pre-planned “60 Minutes” episode was published on a streaming platform owned by Global TV, the network that has the rights to “60 Minutes” in Canada.
mine шахта
The preplanned episode led with correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi’s story — the one that Weiss stopped from airing in the US because she said it was “not ready.”
mine.exchange
Several Canadian viewers shared clips and summaries of the story on social media, and within hours, the videos went viral on platforms like Reddit and Bluesky.
“Watch fast,” one of the Canadian viewers wrote on Bluesky, predicting that CBS would try to have the videos taken offline.
Related article
The Free Press’ Honestly with Bari Weiss (pictured) hosts Senator Ted Cruz presented by Uber and X on January 18, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Inside the Bari Weiss decision that led to a ‘60 Minutes’ crisis
Progressive Substack writers and commentators blasted out the clips and urged people to share them. “This could wind up being the most-watched newsmagazine segment in television history,” the high-profile Trump antagonist George Conway commented on X.
A CBS News spokesperson had no immediate comment on the astonishing turn of events.
Alfonsi’s report was weeks in the making. Weiss screened it for the first time last Thursday night. The story was finalized on Friday, according to CBS sources, and was announced in a press release that same day.
On Saturday morning, Weiss began to change her mind about the story and raised concerns about its content, including the lack of responses from the relevant Trump administration officials.
But networks like CBS sometimes deliver taped programming to affiliates like Global TV ahead of time. That appears to be what happened in this case: The Friday version of the “60 Minutes” episode is what streamed to Canadian viewers.
The inadvertent Canadian stream is “the best thing that could have happened,” a CBS source told CNN on Monday evening, arguing that the Alfonsi piece is “excellent” and should have been televised as intended.
People close to Weiss have argued that the piece was imbalanced, however, because it did not include interviews with Trump officials.
Weiss told staffers on Monday, “We need to be able to get the principals on the record and on camera.” However, in an earlier memo to colleagues, Alfonsi asserted that her team tried, and their “refusal to be interviewed” was “a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story.”
At the end of the segment that streamed on Global TV’s platform, Alfonsi said Homeland Security “declined our request for an interview and referred all questions about CECOT to El Salvador. The government there did not respond to our request.”
The segment included sound bites from President Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. But it was clearly meant to be a story about Venezuelan men deported to El Salvador, not about the officials who implemented Trump’s mass deportation policy.
mine шахта
https://minexchange.net
Mensaje de Forrestaroto » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » lewisleonard1968@salpingomyu.ru
In the latest blow to the US offshore wind industry, the Trump administration announced Monday it is suspending the federal leases for all large offshore wind projects currently under construction, citing unspecified national security risks.
trip scan
It marks a major escalation in President Donald Trump’s attacks against offshore wind, a form of energy he has long railed against. The suspension could impact billions of dollars of investment and stall nearly six gigawatts of new electricity set to come online in the next few years.
tripskan
The new sweeping order impacts five projects being built in the Atlantic Ocean, including a massive Virginia offshore wind farm that could eventually be the largest such project in the nation. Set to be completed by the end of 2026, it would supply electricity to Virginia, the state with the world’s largest cluster of power-hungry data centers — and skyrocketing energy costs partially tied to that growing demand. Other wind farms impacted are off the coast of New England.
tripskan
The exact national security risks of concern are unclear. In a news release, the Interior Department cited “national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports,” but didn’t say specifically what those risks were. The release also noted the potential for wind turbine movement and light reflectivity to interfere with radar.
In a Monday Fox Business interview, Interior Sec. Doug Burgum said the Department of Defense has “conclusively” determined that large offshore wind farms “have created radar interference that creates a genuine risk for the US,” especially “our east coast population centers.”
A Department of Defense official said it is working with Interior and other agencies to “assess the possibility of mitigating the national security risks posed by these projects” but had no additional comment.
Last year, Sweden blocked the construction of new wind farms over concerns they could interfere with military radar, amid heightened tensions between the European Union? and Russia. But experts have noted the design of wind farms can be adjusted to account for the issue, and it’s something US government officials have been aware of for decades.
Virginia Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, who serve on the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services committees, respectively, said the administration had “failed to share any new information” justifying the sudden pause.
tripscan top
https://tripscan101.cc
Mensaje de Russelladuck » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » jamesthomas1961@salpingomyu.ru
In the latest blow to the US offshore wind industry, the Trump administration announced Monday it is suspending the federal leases for all large offshore wind projects currently under construction, citing unspecified national security risks.
трипскан сайт
It marks a major escalation in President Donald Trump’s attacks against offshore wind, a form of energy he has long railed against. The suspension could impact billions of dollars of investment and stall nearly six gigawatts of new electricity set to come online in the next few years.
трип скан
The new sweeping order impacts five projects being built in the Atlantic Ocean, including a massive Virginia offshore wind farm that could eventually be the largest such project in the nation. Set to be completed by the end of 2026, it would supply electricity to Virginia, the state with the world’s largest cluster of power-hungry data centers — and skyrocketing energy costs partially tied to that growing demand. Other wind farms impacted are off the coast of New England.
tripskan
The exact national security risks of concern are unclear. In a news release, the Interior Department cited “national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports,” but didn’t say specifically what those risks were. The release also noted the potential for wind turbine movement and light reflectivity to interfere with radar.
In a Monday Fox Business interview, Interior Sec. Doug Burgum said the Department of Defense has “conclusively” determined that large offshore wind farms “have created radar interference that creates a genuine risk for the US,” especially “our east coast population centers.”
A Department of Defense official said it is working with Interior and other agencies to “assess the possibility of mitigating the national security risks posed by these projects” but had no additional comment.
Last year, Sweden blocked the construction of new wind farms over concerns they could interfere with military radar, amid heightened tensions between the European Union? and Russia. But experts have noted the design of wind farms can be adjusted to account for the issue, and it’s something US government officials have been aware of for decades.
Virginia Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, who serve on the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services committees, respectively, said the administration had “failed to share any new information” justifying the sudden pause.
trip scan
https://tripscan101.cc
Mensaje de Russelladuck » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » jamesthomas1961@salpingomyu.ru
In the latest blow to the US offshore wind industry, the Trump administration announced Monday it is suspending the federal leases for all large offshore wind projects currently under construction, citing unspecified national security risks.
трипскан
It marks a major escalation in President Donald Trump’s attacks against offshore wind, a form of energy he has long railed against. The suspension could impact billions of dollars of investment and stall nearly six gigawatts of new electricity set to come online in the next few years.
tripskan
The new sweeping order impacts five projects being built in the Atlantic Ocean, including a massive Virginia offshore wind farm that could eventually be the largest such project in the nation. Set to be completed by the end of 2026, it would supply electricity to Virginia, the state with the world’s largest cluster of power-hungry data centers — and skyrocketing energy costs partially tied to that growing demand. Other wind farms impacted are off the coast of New England.
трипскан
The exact national security risks of concern are unclear. In a news release, the Interior Department cited “national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports,” but didn’t say specifically what those risks were. The release also noted the potential for wind turbine movement and light reflectivity to interfere with radar.
In a Monday Fox Business interview, Interior Sec. Doug Burgum said the Department of Defense has “conclusively” determined that large offshore wind farms “have created radar interference that creates a genuine risk for the US,” especially “our east coast population centers.”
A Department of Defense official said it is working with Interior and other agencies to “assess the possibility of mitigating the national security risks posed by these projects” but had no additional comment.
Last year, Sweden blocked the construction of new wind farms over concerns they could interfere with military radar, amid heightened tensions between the European Union? and Russia. But experts have noted the design of wind farms can be adjusted to account for the issue, and it’s something US government officials have been aware of for decades.
Virginia Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, who serve on the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services committees, respectively, said the administration had “failed to share any new information” justifying the sudden pause.
трипскан сайт
https://tripscan101.cc
Mensaje de LewisInent » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » billbergeron2018@salpingomyu.ru
In the latest blow to the US offshore wind industry, the Trump administration announced Monday it is suspending the federal leases for all large offshore wind projects currently under construction, citing unspecified national security risks.
трип скан
It marks a major escalation in President Donald Trump’s attacks against offshore wind, a form of energy he has long railed against. The suspension could impact billions of dollars of investment and stall nearly six gigawatts of new electricity set to come online in the next few years.
tripscan top
The new sweeping order impacts five projects being built in the Atlantic Ocean, including a massive Virginia offshore wind farm that could eventually be the largest such project in the nation. Set to be completed by the end of 2026, it would supply electricity to Virginia, the state with the world’s largest cluster of power-hungry data centers — and skyrocketing energy costs partially tied to that growing demand. Other wind farms impacted are off the coast of New England.
tripskan
The exact national security risks of concern are unclear. In a news release, the Interior Department cited “national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports,” but didn’t say specifically what those risks were. The release also noted the potential for wind turbine movement and light reflectivity to interfere with radar.
In a Monday Fox Business interview, Interior Sec. Doug Burgum said the Department of Defense has “conclusively” determined that large offshore wind farms “have created radar interference that creates a genuine risk for the US,” especially “our east coast population centers.”
A Department of Defense official said it is working with Interior and other agencies to “assess the possibility of mitigating the national security risks posed by these projects” but had no additional comment.
Last year, Sweden blocked the construction of new wind farms over concerns they could interfere with military radar, amid heightened tensions between the European Union? and Russia. But experts have noted the design of wind farms can be adjusted to account for the issue, and it’s something US government officials have been aware of for decades.
Virginia Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, who serve on the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services committees, respectively, said the administration had “failed to share any new information” justifying the sudden pause.
трипскан
https://tripscan101.cc
Mensaje de LewisInent » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » billbergeron2018@salpingomyu.ru
In the latest blow to the US offshore wind industry, the Trump administration announced Monday it is suspending the federal leases for all large offshore wind projects currently under construction, citing unspecified national security risks.
tripskan
It marks a major escalation in President Donald Trump’s attacks against offshore wind, a form of energy he has long railed against. The suspension could impact billions of dollars of investment and stall nearly six gigawatts of new electricity set to come online in the next few years.
tripscan top
The new sweeping order impacts five projects being built in the Atlantic Ocean, including a massive Virginia offshore wind farm that could eventually be the largest such project in the nation. Set to be completed by the end of 2026, it would supply electricity to Virginia, the state with the world’s largest cluster of power-hungry data centers — and skyrocketing energy costs partially tied to that growing demand. Other wind farms impacted are off the coast of New England.
tripscan top
The exact national security risks of concern are unclear. In a news release, the Interior Department cited “national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports,” but didn’t say specifically what those risks were. The release also noted the potential for wind turbine movement and light reflectivity to interfere with radar.
In a Monday Fox Business interview, Interior Sec. Doug Burgum said the Department of Defense has “conclusively” determined that large offshore wind farms “have created radar interference that creates a genuine risk for the US,” especially “our east coast population centers.”
A Department of Defense official said it is working with Interior and other agencies to “assess the possibility of mitigating the national security risks posed by these projects” but had no additional comment.
Last year, Sweden blocked the construction of new wind farms over concerns they could interfere with military radar, amid heightened tensions between the European Union? and Russia. But experts have noted the design of wind farms can be adjusted to account for the issue, and it’s something US government officials have been aware of for decades.
Virginia Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, who serve on the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services committees, respectively, said the administration had “failed to share any new information” justifying the sudden pause.
трипскан сайт
https://tripscan101.cc
Mensaje de Arisha31Ei » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » 13@gvozdvkedah.fun
Hello .
Hi. A 31 great website 1 that I found on the Internet.
Check out this website. There’s a great article there. https://conversationswithbianca.com/traveling-with-kids-is-it-worth-the-effort/|
There is sure to be a lot of useful and interesting information for you here.
You’ll find everything you need and more. Feel free to follow the link below.
Mensaje de Jamesevera » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » xrumer23anora@gmail.com
Mensaje de Geraldbal » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » xrumer23anora@gmail.com
Mensaje de Arisha31Ei » 28 de diciembre de 2025 » 13@gvozdvkedah.fun
Hello comrades
Hello. A 31 excellent site 1 that I found on the Internet.
Check out this website. There’s a great article there. https://zigglytech.com/clip-thinking-and-how-it-affects-our-daily-lives/|
There is sure to be a lot of useful and interesting information for you here.
You’ll find everything you need and more. Feel free to follow the link below.